Spine surgery
Drilling and decompression next to the nerve root and dura, where a single newton too many causes damage. SmartStencil’s spine demo stops the instrument on nerve root contact and retracts it to safety.
Products
Surgical robots can see, but they can’t feel. SmartStencil gives any surgical robot a sense of touch: it learns the safe force for every tissue, then keeps the robot in its lane, slowing down, pushing back and retracting before harm is done.
Force sensing today means sensorised instruments: new hardware, built robot by robot. Most surgical robots don’t have it, so every one of them still relies on a human to prevent harm.
adverse events from surgical robots reported to the FDA, 2000–2024
FDA MAUDE databaseaverage cost per patient of a surgical complication
JAMA Surgery, 2023of surgical errors happen during execution, exactly where robots act
WHO Surgical Safety, 2023Where force feedback exists, it depends on sensor-equipped instruments. Every other robot is force-blind.
Vision-language-action models translate commands into motion. None of them encode how much force is safe for each tissue.
Without force awareness, autonomous surgical actions have no safety boundary to prove to regulators.
Simulation, synthetic data and robot-motion models are already live. What sits between deciding and doing, knowing what is safe, is not. That is where SmartStencil fits.
Whoever builds the perception and planning, the robot still needs to know what is safe to touch.
Foundation models, reasoning and planning
Perception, motion and decision-making
Constraint intelligence and force safety: what is safe, for this patient, on this robot
Robotic hardware, actuation and sensor fusion
Physical interaction with patient tissue
SmartStencil is a vision-force model. Before the first incision, it builds a patient-specific map of safe force, then feeds it into the robot’s own control and learning stack. It plugs into any VLA or reinforcement-learning pipeline.
Pre-procedure constraint engine
US Patent 11,631,341 granted. Engine PCT filed.
Force sensing is optional. Force intelligence isn’t.
SmartStencil works with no new sensors. Where a deployment calls for it, it fuses every signal the operating room offers.
Like lane assist in a car, SmartStencil doesn’t take the wheel. It keeps the robot inside safe limits in real time, and it responds the way an expert surgeon would: gradually, not with an emergency brake.
The robot self-corrects and retracts back to safety, so the procedure can continue.
Different limits for hard bone, dura and soft tissue, set for each patient.
Every intervention is rendered to the surgeon or robot controller inside the control loop.
Each event becomes a reinforcement-learning signal that improves the robot’s policy.
Normal operation. Force stays within the tissue boundary.
Approaching the boundary. A slow-down signal is sent to the controller.
Boundary reached. The robot is pushed back with graduated resistance.
Severe breach, such as nerve root contact. Motion halts immediately.
The robot retracts on its own. Not just stopped: back on track.
The same force limits travel from simulation to the operating room, on the same robot.
Reinforcement learning against patient-specific force envelopes, validated across 1,000 sim-to-real trials.
Run the procedure before surgery and see exactly where the boundaries are.
The rehearsed constraints go live in the operating room, enforced in real time.
Robots already have dexterity. SmartStencil gives them geometric intelligence: knowing where the safe edge is, even when the eye can’t see it.
Drilling and decompression next to the nerve root and dura, where a single newton too many causes damage. SmartStencil’s spine demo stops the instrument on nerve root contact and retracts it to safety.
One in ten women live with endometriosis, and its lesions have no clear margin. Cut too little and it returns; cut too much and organs are injured. Here the no-go zones would be the ureter and bowel.
SmartStencil’s engine is trained on force, kinematic and contact data captured from expert surgeons over three years on Simulatory’s own biomimetic platforms. The taxonomy of surgical failure behind it can’t be crowd-sourced.
Force, kinematics and contact streams for each surgical manoeuvre
Skill-stratified, multi-institution, multi-procedure
On VRspine Pro and SYNspine biomimetic models
Annotated with how surgeons recovered from them
A surgeon network and dataset that took years of clinical access to assemble.
SmartStencil licenses as an embedded layer, so it doesn’t need a regulatory submission of its own. It travels inside the robot maker’s FDA filing and supplies the force-safety validation data that filing needs.
Submissions that integrate SmartStencil are designed to meet the criteria of the FDA’s Safer Technologies Program (STeP), which offers expedited development and review for devices that significantly improve safety.
Reduces known serious adverse events: force boundary violations that cause tissue damage.
Reduces known device failure modes: constraint encoding prevents unsafe robot actions.
No other approach combines surgical interaction data, a protected constraint engine and a layer built to plug into any robot.
| Approach | Surgical interaction data | Works across robots | Regulatory pathway | Physical AI integration |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SmartStencil | Proprietary biomimetic dataset | Any robot, no new hardware | Embedded in OEM submissions | Vision-force-action layer |
| In-house robot development | Limited external data | Single platform | Long internal pathway | Closed stack |
| Generic robotics safety layers | No surgical data | Partial | No regulatory roadmap | Not designed for surgery |
| Raw reinforcement learning | No proprietary data | Not transferable | No path to FDA | No force constraints |
For surgical robot makers, research hospitals and clinical partners. See SmartStencil running on a robot and talk through integration with our team.